Propagator, Interaction, and Scattering

Following our previous introduction of the quantized fields, the next question is about their dynamics, which should be different from the one of point particle and wavefunction in quantum mechanics, and how to describe the physics process and interaction? Though we have the motion equation of fields, we prefer to deal with it using Lagrangian later.

We will only analyze the scalar field φ\varphi as example, with L0=12∂μφ∂μφ−12m2φ2, S[φ]=∫d4x L(φ,∂μφ)\mathcal L_0= \frac12\partial_\mu\varphi\partial^\mu\varphi -\frac12m^2\varphi^2,~S[\varphi]=\int d^4x\,\mathcal L(\varphi,\partial_\mu\varphi), and motion equation (□+m2)φ=0(\square + m^2)\varphi = 0, Fourier expansion φ(x)=∫d3p~[a(p)eipx+a†(p)e−ipx)]\varphi(x) = \int \widetilde{d^3 p}[a(\mathbf{p}) e^{ipx} + a^{\dagger}(\mathbf{p}) e^{-ipx})]. Similarly, many calculation details will be skipped, and some convention may not be unified for now (so you may see different ±\pm in L\mathcal L and other formulas).

Excitement and Dynamics

After quantization, the a(p),a†(p),φ(x)a(\mathbf{p}), a^{\dagger}(\mathbf{p}),\varphi(x) become an operator, for example, ∣p1,p2,…⟩=ap1†ap2†⋯∣0⟩|\mathbf p_1,\mathbf p_2,\ldots\rangle = a^\dagger_{\mathbf p_1} a^\dagger_{\mathbf p_2}\cdots|0\rangle is a n-particle excited state with momentum {pi}\{\mathbf{p_i}\}. We should notice that this is still the same field but in different state, which means all same particle are generated from the identical field. And the field itself can link the vacuum and excited state: φ(x)∣0⟩=∫d3p(2π)32Epeipx∣p⟩\varphi(x)|0\rangle = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3\sqrt{2E_{\mathbf p}}} e^{ipx} |\mathbf p\rangle, which is an amplitude distribution of all possible single-particle mode. Another example is, if the field operator act on a 1-particle state ϕ(x)∣p⟩=e−ipx∣0⟩+∫d3k~ eikx∣k,p⟩\phi(x)|p\rangle = e^{-ipx}|0\rangle + \int\widetilde{d^3k}\, e^{ikx}|k,p\rangle, it will gives a combination of vacuum and 2-particle state.

  • Like what we have learned in quantum mechanics, the interaction of a quantum state is the evolution of amplitude distribution on different momentum mode.

Consider the propagation of the field state, a natural question is how the excited state of fields in different spacetime correlate with each other? Let’s first consider the amplitude overlap between ∣φy⟩=φ(y)∣0⟩, ∣φx⟩=φ(x)∣0⟩|\varphi_y\rangle=\varphi(y)|0\rangle, ~|\varphi_x\rangle=\varphi(x)|0\rangle, where φ†=φ\varphi^{\dagger}=\varphi for real scalar field. Thus ⟨φx∣φy⟩=⟨0∣φ(x)φ(y)∣0⟩\langle \varphi_x | \varphi_y \rangle = \langle 0| \varphi(x)\varphi(y) | 0 \rangle, and we can also write it using the spacetime transition generator and Heisenberg picture φ(x)=eiPxφ(0)e−iPx→⟨0∣φ(0)e−iP(x−y)φ(0)∣0⟩\varphi(x) = e^{iPx} \varphi(0) e^{-iPx} \rightarrow \langle 0 |\varphi(0) e^{-iP(x-y)} \varphi(0) | 0\rangle. Then we expand it with mode ⟨0∣ϕ(x)ϕ(y)∣0⟩=∑n⟨0∣ϕ(x)∣n⟩⟨n∣ϕ(y)∣0⟩=∫d3p(2π)32Epe−ip⋅(x−y)\langle0|\phi(x)\phi(y)|0\rangle = \sum_n \langle0|\phi(x)|n\rangle \langle n|\phi(y)|0\rangle = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3 2E_{\mathbf p}} e^{-ip\cdot(x-y)}, and read it as each mode is generated at yy, then evolves and overlap with the excited state of the same field at xx. How does the field in different spacetime position connect gives its dynamics, or called translation amplitude, like in quantum mechanics K(xf,tf;xi,ti)=⟨xf∣e−iH(tf−ti)∣xi⟩K(x_f,t_f;x_i,t_i) = \langle x_f| e^{-iH(t_f-t_i)} |x_i\rangle.

Then we introduce time ordering as we don’t need to ask yy generated before xx, and it gives DF(x−y)≡⟨0∣T{ϕ(x)ϕ(y)}∣0⟩=∫d3p(2π)3eip⋅r2Ep[θ(t)e−iEpt+θ(−t)e+iEpt]D_F(x-y) \equiv \langle0| T\{\phi(x)\phi(y)\} |0\rangle= \int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{e^{i\mathbf p\cdot\mathbf r}}{2E_{\mathbf p}} [ \theta(t)e^{-iE_{\mathbf p}t} + \theta(-t)e^{+iE_{\mathbf p}t} ]. Using the contour integral of the complex function, we can verify that 12E[θ(t)e−iEt+θ(−t)e+iEt]=∫−∞∞dp02πi e−ip0t(p0)2−E2+iϵ\frac1{2E} \left[ \theta(t)e^{-iEt} + \theta(-t)e^{+iEt} \right] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dp^0}{2\pi} \frac{i\,e^{-ip^0t}} {(p^0)^2-E^2+i\epsilon}, and derive DF(x−y)=∫d4p(2π)4ip2−m2+iϵe−ip⋅(x−y)D_F(x-y) = \int\frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{i}{p^2-m^2+i\epsilon} e^{-ip\cdot(x-y)}. Notice that (□x+m2)DF(x−y)=−iδ(4)(x−y)(\Box_x+m^2)D_F(x-y) = -i\delta^{(4)}(x-y) is the Green’s function of Klein-Gordon operator, which means the excitement at yy can serve as the source to have an influence at xx. This shows us that the propagator can serve as the inverse of dynamic operator DF∼(□+m2)−1D_F \sim (\Box+m^2)^{-1}. In momentum space, we can derive DF(p)=ip2−m2+iϵD_F(p) = \frac{i}{p^2-m^2+i\epsilon}, the contribution of each mode, with the Fourier transformation DF(x−y)=∫d4p(2π)4e−ip⋅(x−y)DF(p)D_F(x-y) = \int\frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4} e^{-ip\cdot(x-y)} D_F(p).

  • Of course, the free particle should be on-shell p2=m2p^2=m^2. In the propagator, we might integrate over the pp, which is just a variable and only have physical mass on the pole p2=m2p^2=m^2, the internal pp in the propagator is not an observable physical state.

Lagrangian and Interaction

To change the state of the field, there needs external source or interaction. Source can be introduced in the Lagrangian L0=−12∂μφ∂μφ−12m2φ2+J(x)φ(x)\mathcal L_0= -\frac12\partial_\mu\varphi\partial^\mu\varphi -\frac12m^2\varphi^2 + J(x)\varphi(x), which derive the motion equation (□+m2)φ(x)=J(x)(\square + m^2)\varphi (x) = J(x). With propagator, we can write the influenced field as φ(x)=φ0(x)+∫d4yGR(x−y)J(y)\varphi(x) = \varphi_{0}(x) + \int d^4 y G_R(x-y) J(y). For another field, there must be a cross term in the Lagrangian to couple in the motion equation: Lint=−g2φχ2\mathcal L_{int} = -\frac{g}{2}\varphi \chi^2, which derives (□+mϕ2)ϕ=−g2χ2, (□+mχ2)χ=−gϕχ(\Box+m_\phi^2)\phi = -\frac g2\chi^2,~ (\Box+m_\chi^2)\chi = -g\phi\chi, and the structure of one field become the source of another field in motion equation. The coupling between these field operators then allows the transition between different Fock states like φ→χχ\varphi \rightarrow \chi\chi.

We will use the interaction picture and canonical derivation with Hamiltonian to proceed the scattering process φφ→φφ\varphi \varphi \rightarrow \varphi \varphi here. Let’s consider Lint=−λ4!φ4\mathcal L_{int} = -\frac{\lambda}{4!} \varphi^4 first, note that the coefficient is defined for later convenience. In interaction picture, we have HI=∫d3xλ4!φ4H_{I} = \int d^3 x \frac{\lambda}{4!} \varphi^4, iddt∣ΨI(t)⟩=HI(t)∣ΨI(t)⟩i\frac{d}{dt}|\Psi_I(t)\rangle = H_I(t)|\Psi_I(t)\rangle, and UI(t,t0)=Texp⁡[−i∫t0tdt′ HI(t′)]U_I(t,t_0) = T\exp \left[ -i\int_{t_0}^{t}dt'\,H_I(t') \right], which can be expanded as Dyson series. For the scattering process, we set the asymptotic boundary with ∣i⟩=lim⁡t→−∞∣p1,p2⟩|i \rangle = \lim_{t \rightarrow -\infty}|p_1,p_2 \rangle and ∣f⟩=lim⁡t→+∞∣p3,p4⟩|f \rangle = \lim_{t \rightarrow + \infty}|p_3,p_4 \rangle.

In this way, we introduce the S-matrix to describe the scattering by S=UI(+∞,−∞)=Texp⁡[i∫d4x Lint(x)]S = U_{I}(+\infty, -\infty) = T\exp\left[i\int d^4x\,\mathcal L_{\mathrm{int}}(x)\right], which can be written as Sfi=⟨f∣UI(+∞,−∞)∣i⟩=out⟨f,+∞∣i,−∞⟩inS_{fi} = \langle f| U_{I}(+ \infty,- \infty) | i \rangle = {}_{\rm out}\langle f,+\infty|i, -\infty\rangle_{\rm in}, and expanded as S=1−iλ4!∫d4x ϕ4(x)+O(λ2)S = 1 -i\frac{\lambda}{4!} \int d^4x\,\phi^4(x) +O(\lambda^2) in perturbation theory. We can write ⟨p3p4∣S(1)∣p1p2⟩=−iλ4!∫d4x ⟨p3p4∣ϕ4(x)∣p1p2⟩\langle p_3p_4| S^{(1)} |p_1p_2\rangle = -i\frac{\lambda}{4!} \int d^4x\, \langle p_3p_4| \phi^4(x) |p_1p_2\rangle, and there must be 2 a(p)a(\mathbf{p}) for in and 2 a†(p)a^{\dagger}(\mathbf{p}) for out, which yields 4!4! equivalent permutations and gives ⟨f∣S(1)∣i⟩c=−iλ(2π)4δ(4)(Pi−Pf)\langle f|S^{(1)}|i\rangle_c = -i\lambda (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)}(P_i-P_f). In our normalization and conservation, it means that the scattering amplitude is iM=−iλi \mathcal{M} = - i \lambda, the left dynamic term in the transition amplitude besides (2π)4δ(4)(Pi−Pf)(2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)}(P_i-P_f). Consider the general Lint=−gn!φn\mathcal{L}_{int} = - \frac{g}{n!} \varphi^n, the first-order expansion of S-matrix is S(1)=−ign!∫d4x ϕn(x)S^{(1)} =-\frac{ig}{n!}\int d^4x ~ \phi^n(x). This corresponds to the interaction point of nn field operators, or called vertex, which similarly yields the vertex factor −ig-ig.

The φφ→φφ\varphi \varphi \rightarrow \varphi \varphi process can also correspond to another interaction term Lint=−g3!φ3\mathcal L_{int} = -\frac{g}{3!}\varphi^3 in simply tree level with an internal propagator line. This requires ⟨p3p4∣S3(1)S3(1)∣p1p2⟩\langle p_3p_4|S^{(1)}_3 S^{(1)}_3|p_1p_2\rangle for 2 interaction points and 4 external scalar lines in Feynman diagram, which corresponds to the second-order term in the Dyson expansion S(2)=(−ig)22!(3!)2∫d4x d4y T{ϕ3(x)ϕ3(y)}=12!T{S(1)S(1)}S^{(2)} = \frac{(-ig)^2}{2!(3!)^2} \int d^4x\,d^4y\, T\{\phi^3(x)\phi^3(y)\} = \frac{1}{2!}T\{S^{(1)}S^{(1)}\}. In the scattering matrix, we can write ⟨p3p4∣T{ϕ3(x)ϕ3(y)}∣p1p2⟩=⟨0∣ap4ap3 T{ϕ3(x)ϕ3(y)} ap1†ap2†∣0⟩\langle p_3p_4| T\{\phi^3(x)\phi^3(y)\} |p_1p_2\rangle = \langle0| a_{p_4}a_{p_3}\, T\{\phi^3(x)\phi^3(y)\}\, a_{p_1}^\dagger a_{p_2}^\dagger |0\rangle. For a giving incoming external attachment, ⟨0∣ϕ(x)∣p⟩=e−ipx\langle0|\phi(x)|p\rangle=e^{-ipx} gives the plane-wave factor, while other components are organized into other contraction and Feynman diagrams. Then the left terms is ⟨0∣T{ϕ(x)ϕ(y)}∣0⟩=DF(x−y)\langle0| T\{\phi(x)\phi(y)\} |0\rangle = D_F(x-y), which is the propagator we introduced before! For example, the s-channel, where internal q=p1+p2, q2=sq = p_1 + p_2,~ q^2 = s, corresponds to iMs=(−ig)2is−m2+iϵi\mathcal M_s = (-ig)^2 \frac{i}{s-m^2+i\epsilon} in S(2)S^{(2)}, as well as t=(p1−p3)2, u=(p1−p4)2t=(p_1-p_3)^2,~ u=(p_1-p_4)^2. Then we can write the amplitude iM=(−ig)2[is−m2+iϵ+it−m2+iϵ+iu−m2+iϵ]i\mathcal M = (-ig)^2 \left[ \frac{i}{s-m^2+i\epsilon} + \frac{i}{t-m^2+i\epsilon} + \frac{i}{u-m^2+i\epsilon} \right].

  • We skip the Wick theorem and contraction here.

Cross section and Experiment

To derive the cross section, we need to deal with the δ(Pi−Pf)\delta(P_i - P_f) in ⟨f∣S−1∣i⟩\langle f | S-1 | i \rangle. Let’s work in the finite space VV and time TT, we get ∣⟨f∣S−1∣i⟩∣2=(2π)4VTδ(4)(Pf−Pi)∣M∣2|\langle f|S-1|i\rangle|^2 = (2\pi)^4VT \delta^{(4)}(P_f-P_i) |\mathcal M|^2. Consider the infinitesimal momentum region in final state d3pf1...d3pfnd^3 p_{f1}...d^3 p_{fn}, the corresponding probability is dP=∣⟨f∣S−1∣i⟩∣2⟨i∣i⟩⟨f∣f⟩∏fVd3pf(2π)3=TV14E1E2∣M∣2dΦndP = \frac{ |\langle f|S-1|i\rangle|^2 }{ \langle i|i\rangle\langle f|f\rangle } \prod_f \frac{Vd^3p_f}{(2\pi)^3} = \frac{T}{V} \frac{1}{4E_1E_2} |\mathcal M|^2 d\Phi_n under our convention ⟨p′∣p⟩=2Ep(2π)3δ(3)(p−p′)\langle p'|p\rangle = 2E_{\mathbf p}(2\pi)^3 \delta^{(3)}(\mathbf p-\mathbf p'). The dΦn=(2π)4δ(4)(∑ipi−∑fpf)∏fd3pf(2π)3 2Efd\Phi_n = (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)} \left( \sum_i p_i - \sum_f p_f \right) \prod_f \frac{d^3p_f}{(2\pi)^3\,2E_f} is called Lorentz-invariant phase space (LIPS), and you can identify the ∣M∣2|\mathcal{M}|^2 as the weight of a certain final-state configuration. Under time unit we get the transition rate dR=dPTdR = \frac{dP}{T}, and under space unit, we define the particle beam density as 1V\frac{1}{V} (only 1 particle in V), and the relative velocity vrelv_{rel} of 2 beams is used to define the incident flux Φin=vrelV\Phi_{in} = \frac{v_{rel}}{V}, which yields the cross section dσ=dRΦin=14E1E2vrel∣M∣2dΦnd\sigma = \frac{dR}{\Phi_{in}} = \frac{1}{4E_1E_2v_{\rm rel}} |\mathcal M|^2 d\Phi_n.

Generally, we can write E1E2vrel=(p1⋅p2)2−m12m22E_1E_2v_{\rm rel} = \sqrt{ (p_1\cdot p_2)^2-m_1^2m_2^2 }, and ∣M∣2‾\overline{|\mathcal{M}|^2} to average over initial states and sum over final states, as well as different channels’ amplitudes Mtot=∑all diagramsMi\mathcal M_{\rm tot} = \sum_{\text{all diagrams}} \mathcal M_i, and express dσ=1flux∣M∣2‾dΦnd\sigma = \frac{1}{\text{flux}} \overline{|\mathcal M|^2} d\Phi_n, where flux is the beam normalization. For scattering process like (p1+p2→p3+p4p_1+p_2\rightarrow p_3+p_4), we define p1+p2=0, p3+p4=0, ECM=s\mathbf p_1+\mathbf p_2=0,~ \mathbf p_3+\mathbf p_4=0,~ E_{CM} = \sqrt{s}, and write dΦ2=(2π)4δ(4)(p1+p2−p3−p4)d3p3(2π)32E3d3p4(2π)32E4=116π2∣pf∣sdΩpfd\Phi_2 = (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)}(p_1+p_2-p_3-p_4) \frac{d^3p_3}{(2\pi)^3 2E_3} \frac{d^3p_4}{(2\pi)^3 2E_4} = \frac1{16\pi^2} \frac{|\mathbf p_f|}{\sqrt s} d\Omega_{p_f}, where pi=p1,pf=p3p_i=p_1,p_f = p_3, then we can give dσdΩ=164π2s∣pf∣∣pi∣∣M∣2‾\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = \frac{1}{64\pi^2s} \frac{|\mathbf p_f|}{|\mathbf p_i|} \overline{|\mathcal M|^2}. For φφ→φφ\varphi \varphi \rightarrow \varphi \varphi, we need to add 12!\frac{1}{2!} to avoid repeated calculation of p3↔p4p_3 \leftrightarrow p_4, and with pi=pf\mathbf{p}_i = \mathbf{p}_f we can write dσdΩ=12!∣M∣2‾64π2s\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = \frac{1}{2!} \frac{\overline{|\mathcal M|^2}} {64\pi^2s}. Specially, you should write iMtot=−iλ+(−ig)2[is−m2+iϵ+it−m2+iϵ+iu−m2+iϵ]i\mathcal M_{\rm tot} = -i\lambda + (-ig)^2 \left[ \frac{i}{s-m^2+i\epsilon} + \frac{i}{t-m^2+i\epsilon} + \frac{i}{u-m^2+i\epsilon} \right] based on our previously defined Lint=−g3!ϕ3−λ4!ϕ4\mathcal L_{\rm int} = -\frac{g}{3!}\phi^3 -\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4.

For decay process (p→p1+...+pn)(p \rightarrow p_1 + ... +p_n), we only have 1 particle in the initial state and have ⟨i∣i⟩=2EiV\langle i | i \rangle=2E_i V. And we can write dP=T2Ei∣M∣2dΦndP = \frac{T}{2E_i} |\mathcal M|^2 d\Phi_n, where Ei=miE_i = m_i in rest frame, and yield decay rate dΓ=dPT=12EA∣M∣2dΦnd\Gamma = \frac{dP}{T} = \frac{1}{2E_A}|\mathcal M|^2d\Phi_n. For φ→χχ\varphi \rightarrow \chi\chi in Lint=−g2Φχ2\mathcal L_{\rm int} = -\frac g2\Phi\chi^2, we have ∣M∣2=g2|\mathcal M|^2=g^2 and ∣pf∣=M21−4m2M2|\mathbf p_f| = \frac M2\sqrt{1-\frac{4m^2}{M^2}}. As there is not (θ,ϕ)(\theta,\phi) dependent, we can just calculate the decay rate over Ωpf\Omega_{p_f}, and multiply with the permutation factor 12!\frac{1}{2!} to get ΓΦ→χχ=g232πM1−4m2M2\Gamma_{\Phi\to\chi\chi} = \frac{g^2}{32\pi M} \sqrt{1-\frac{4m^2}{M^2}}. This decay rate corresponds to dNN(t)=−Γdt\frac{dN}{N(t)}=-\Gamma dt in experiment, and multi channels should also sum up Γtotal=∑fΓf\Gamma_{\rm total} = \sum_f\Gamma_f, where BR(i→f)=ΓfΓtotal\mathrm{BR}(i\to f) = \frac{\Gamma_f}{\Gamma_{\rm total}} (this is different from sum over different Feynman diagrams for amplitude). For a specific process in experiment, we use the production cross section, branch ratio, acceptance and efficiency to calculate the expected signal events: Nsignal≈Lint σ(pp→H+X) BR(H→f) AεN_{\rm signal} \approx \mathcal L_{\rm int}\, \sigma(pp\to H+X)\, \mathrm{BR}(H\to f)\, A\varepsilon.

We’d like to introduce Feynman Rules for calculation, which assign corresponding mathematical factors to the amplitude components in Feynman diagrams of certain Lagrangian conveniently. In our previous derivation, we have −iλ∼−λ4!ϕ4-i\lambda \sim -\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4 for 4-vertex, −ig∼−g3!ϕ3-ig \sim -\frac{g}{3!}\phi^3 for 3-vertex, ⟨0∣Tϕ(x)ϕ(y)∣0⟩∼ip2−m2+iϵ\langle0|T\phi(x)\phi(y)|0\rangle \sim \frac{i}{p^2-m^2+i\epsilon} for internal propagator line; and 1 for external line of on-shell incoming or outgoing particle, each vertex requires momentum conservation, sum over the amplitudes for the same process, with a symmetry factor for identical process. In later loop correction, we will introduce the integral over internal momentum in loops. And different Feynman Rules will also be derived for different Lagrangian.

Another way to deal with physical process is using path integral, where we use the Action and generating functional. We will introduce it in other sections as L→S[ϕ]→Z[J]→correlation functions→LSZ→M\mathcal L \rightarrow S[\phi] \rightarrow Z[J] \rightarrow \text{correlation functions} \rightarrow \text{LSZ} \rightarrow \mathcal M.